Possible Accidental Discovery

I may have accidentally discovered a way to locate information on the surface of a black hole. I began with a theoretical double slit experiment using a light horizon theory I made, located here:
https://hackaday.io/project/6631-the-theoretical-hadron-collider/log/20559-the-story-so-far

Here is the double slit experiment:

I then asked what should happen with a double slit experiment onto the surface of a black hole:

I think the horizon of the electron(red) may have to be halved, but with a holographic universe, I find the enormous freedom of putting the experiment in the whole universe.

Simulated Double Slit Experiment

 

In stead of assuming that the electrons hit a target flat surface as waves or particles, in stead assume that when the electrons hit the target as waves, they are not hitting a flat surface in your lab, but are in stead importations on the edge of the universe (the Zero Horizon). They only hit the information OF the board. Then assume that when you observe the electron passing through the double slit it has to be there.

I think Susskind is right, the universe appears to be a hologram.

I am theoretically doing a thought experi
Note: Use color coding from previous image.

Nothing

Nothing

Zero, nothing, has some interesting properties. There are only two ways to arrive at it x-x, and x/infinity, these are the only ways to arrive at zero, so in terms of finite things, zero is its own opposite. It can't exist, ever, and thus when one arrives at the point of nothing you are guaranteed to find something. Nothing is a thing which does not exist; it’s a paradox, a logical contradiction, as is zero two exact opposites, always two exact opposites. A thing which is opposed to its self MUST destroy its self:

{

M=Infinity

Diameter=Zero,

///A Black Hole///

4Dr, ///Calculate it’s for dimensional radius ///

///(The four dimensional radius of a black hole must exceed the light horizon of the universe, and must exceed the total horizon of the universe to be above the Planck Mass and remain stable. The reason for the necessity of a four dimensional radius is simple, in three dimensional space it is absolutely impossible to observe what is on and beyond the other side of a black hole, hence it must have a four dimensional radius which exceeds the radius of the universe)///
///

///

Ru, ///Radius of the universe///

4Dr-Ru

0/(4Dr-Ru)=0

Therefore 0(0)=(4Dr-Ru), 0/(4Dr-Ru)=0    ///!!!!/2, averaged together///

1+(sqrt4Dr)/2

sqrt256= 16,=    [-8,-7,-6,-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] =0

                                        =-16/2                              =16/2

///It is divided by two, I am aware that there is also the negative multiplied by the negative but, Therefore 0(0)=(4Dr-Ru), 0/(4Dr-Ru)=0    !!!!/2, averaged together///

///There is a bit of a race going on: The first theorist to leave the universe wins///

}

The independent variable of the divisor of zero is irrelevant, because when one breaks the universe down further and further it is not a stretch to find it approaches infinity, in broken parts. So 0/x=0, 0(0)=x   X can be an infinite number. The idea of looking before the initial singularity is a logical contradiction because all one does in this thought process is move the initial singularity, and thus miss the point of the whole thing, you can never, EVER have nothing, and the moment you have it, it will destroy its self and you end up with something.

Simulated Micro Black Hole Evaporation Experiment

Simulated Micro Black Hole Evaporation Experiment: Black holes, even micro black holes, weigh the mass of mountains at least, and thus have huge inertia. In every case, there is no known object which can escape the event horizon of a black hole, not light, not neutrinos, but what about the inertia of another micro black hole? If two black holes could be forced close enough as to pass partially into the event horizon of one another, it is possible that the larger mass micro black hole could begin to consume the mass of the smaller mass micro black hole. There is a finite mass, known as the Planck Mass, which a black hole must be above, or it will evaporate. Even the reduction to just below the Planck mass of such a micro black hole would cause what I am surmising to be only describable as a mini supernova. So if the the inertia of our smaller micro black hole is enough to carry it into and out of again the event horizon of the larger micro black hole, and the singularity of our smaller micro black hole is outside the event horizon of the higher mass micro black hole when it drops below the Planck Mass the energy released would be as converting you know, a mountain into energy instantly.

The Experiment: I intend to simulate the evaporation of a black hole using two conspiracies (conspiracy in this case referring simply to a large mass of individuals engaged in covert actions/secret acts). Conspiracies function quite similar to black holes within the social makeup of civilization. The lower mass conspiracy is a hate site I am surmising is there, but since direct detection is impossible, all I have is supposition at this point.

The spork mass refers to the minimum psychological mass to sustain socially a conspiracy.
The spork length refers the maximum psychological detail level.
Hokum Radiation refers to the cryptic remarks emitted by a conspiracy in regards to the secrets they keep.

The Spork Mass is the simulated Plank Mass, and Hokum Radiation is the simulated Hawking Radiation. I will need is some kind of energy drive to move the conspiracy towards another larger conspiracy, so I will force some of the Hokum Radiation back into the event horizon of the conspiracy to attempt to drive it towards a much larger conspiracy. It is my hope that the larger mass conspiracy will consume much of the mass of the lower mass conspiracy, and with the singularity of the lower mass conspiracy outside the higher mass conspiracies event horizon the smaller conspiracy will drop below the Spork Mass and simulate digitally the evaporation of a black hole. Please bare in mind that psychological and social processes translated into physical concepts are much slower than their physical counterparts.

Thank you, ZI's THC

***Update***

ZI's THC and The Zero Report would like to apologize for underestimating, grossly, the potential effects of this experiment. We neglected to account for the psychological energy released propelling other simulated micro black holes(hate sites) into other simulated micro black holes and causing a simulated chain reaction of simulated micro black holes colliding and doping below the spork mass to thus evaporate.

Fortunately it appears to have not caused a psychological Trinity all over again, so we are happy that this miscalculation was caught ahead of time.

Thanks again, The Zero Report and ZI's THC

***UPDATED UPDATE***

ZI's THC has determined  that the extended chain reaction evaporation is unlikely, thus the experiment will continue.

Thanks once again, ZI's THC

Trying To Visualize Relativity

AI Definition (Update, Sorry about the typo)

A Black Hole In Three Dimensional Space

I am not 100% sure of this, but a black hole evaporating in a particle collision should resemble this pattern roughly.